Green Car Wash Windmill Controversy
Posted by robert.w.burke on 28 Feb 2008 at 02:10 pm | Tagged as: General
For those not yet acquainted with us and the story of our quest to install a wind turbine at our car wash/quick lube in New Jersey, here’s a brief summary.
An environmentally friendly car wash? Yes, it’s true. In Wayne, NJ, our car wash uses solar panels to create clean electricity; cleanly burns used motor oil in special furnaces to heat our facility; recycles our water; uses bio-degradeable soaps; and uses energy efficient lighting. Recognized by NJ’s governor with the Governor’s Award for Environmental Excellence and by the NJ state legislature for environmental leadership, Wayne Auto Spa is an early adopter of green technologies and a small business environmental leader.
For two years, we have been trying to work with Wayne Township officials to get permission to build a wind turbine on our property to generate more clean electricity from renewable resources. Our efforts have been frustrating.
The local town leadership made it clear prior to our filing that they oppose this green addition to our property, primarily on the grounds of aesthetics. They also made it clear that we would bear the burden of proving that the turbine would be safe for people, would be quiet, wouldn’t fling ice at people or structures, wouldn’t kill birds, etc. However, there are wind turbines aside more than 80 schools in 23 states in America. They haven’t thrown ice or otherwise hurt anyone. Here are some links to turbines at schools:
There’s even a windmill at a McDonalds.
Wind turbines don’t kill any more birds than other stationery objects (and the Audubon Society agrees).
And they are so quiet that they stay well within state noise limitations imposed by statute.
Let’s remember our site, too. As fond as I am of my business, it’s a car wash – not Yosemite. We are a car wash on 2+ acres on a four-lane county highway (loud) in a commercial zone that has a spaghetti mess of above-ground utility wires, transformers and telephone poles (less than attractive). The property is flanked by a body shop and a day care center. Across the street is a convenience store. Behind us is a hill atop which are about a dozen homes – the closest is about 500 feet from the proposed structure. These homes have a 6-month view (i.e., while the leaves on the trees are down) and that view right now includes our car wash, and a 63 foot tall flagpole.
Our proposed turbine would sit atop a 120 foot tall lattice tower and would have 3 eleven foot blades. The State of New Jersey has its Customer Onsite Renewable Energy Program, which provides partial funding for renewable energy projects. This program seeks to implement public policy favoring renewable energy. Our turbine has been approved for partial funding of this program to the tune of $50,000. That leaves us with about $30,000 left to buy the turbine and who knows how much to fund a protracted legal process. We’ve already spent upwards of $25,000.
We think that the resistance to our proposal is largely a function of fear — that neighboring property values might be impacted by our turbine.
If every Planning Board/Zoning Board in the country needs to have hearings on these same issues over and over, we will waste a huge amount of time and money. This of course will strongly discourage folks from trying to adopt this technology – contrary to overwhelming federal and state public policy. (New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law even lists the incorporation of renewable energy into land use as one of its goals!)
In fact, we think that federal legislation needs to be adopted to establish clear rules for small wind turbine siting that binds municipalities and landowners throughout the country. That’s how cell towers were handled — with the Telecommunications Act of 1996. (Ironically, I have been advised by Township officials that if I want a cell tower, they can only tell me what color to make it — yet they can block wind turbines!)
We think energy and environmental issues facing us all are too important to let this issue fade away. Yet we cannot afford to finance what will no doubt be a protracted legal battle. One fall back we are considering is to put up a 50-foot tower behind the setback line. Since the turbine is a permitted use in this zone, and this would comply with the relevant zoning ordinances, we cannot be rightfully denied. Sadly, we’d be making a point & not much electricity. But at least folks would learn that wind turbines don’t explode, don’t fall down, aren’t deafening and so on. Maybe this is the best we can do for now.
We’ve gotten lots of press coverage on this issue. Here are a few links.:
- Here’s how the New York Times covered it
- Check out the posts following this reprint story
- Check out what’s being said on the Wayne, NJ forum on www.nj.com
- A story from The Record
- We were also featured in a radio broadcast on Air America Radio and have been invited back this Saturday to tape another segment. As soon as show transcripts or audio files are available, we’ll post links to them.
Let us know what you think. If you want to help, we’ve added PayPal buttons on the left side of this page — you can donate $5/$25/$100 to help us finance our efforts if you want to. Any excess funds will be donated to the NJ Environmental Lobby.
We want to thank everyone for their support, donations and comments.
Good luck with your endeavors. Your commitment to the environment and educating the public on the benefits of environmentally friendly business practices is admirable.
Ridiculous!
Ice throws- Check out the NYSERDA site. They provide a couple of insurance company letters regarding ice throws. In 20 years, there were no claims!:
http://www.powernaturally.org/Programs/Wind/toolkit.asp
(listed under General info)
Vertical axis wind turbine: Not sure about the amount of power you are looking to generate, but you should consider this as a possibility. It would get rid of the decibel level argument (very, very low sound emittance with data to back up). Windside is a European company with 20 years+ experience producing them. The local distributor is: http://www.tangarie.com/
(I have no affiliation)
The VAWT would also get rid of the children getting sick debate, the remaining bird kill issues, and give you a bit more flexibility with location of a tower since it performs better in turbulent air. Not sure about price comparisons.
Good luck and don’t give up. The switch to localized wind power is gaining momentum and going to happen with or without the detractors.
smallwindnyc.blogspot.com
Thank you for leading the charge in bringing this fundamental conflict we have in the U.S. to the public’s eye. Everyone is for renewable energy as long as it’s not in “my back yard”. Other countries have benefitted from federal leadership in this space…we have not.
Regardless of who wins the White House, every one of us needs to hold our legislators accountable for fixing this. How on Earth could someone vote against moving $17-18B of incentives from the oil industry to the renewable energy industry…yet more than 100 of our Congressmen did so, and it is likely 40 of our Senators will do so. This must become a bi-partisan effort.
One possible suggestion…enable your turbine tower to be a cell tower, too.
I can’t believe that with the push for green energy, you are being held up on the grounds of asthetics. Wow. Maybe you can persuade them of sound and bird issues with some of the information I found at pacwind. There is nothing unattractive about those turbines. And a 120 foot tower for a turbine is much more attractive then high tension wires. I am having a similar issue where I live. I can’t put a tower on property that is less than an acre. The property I wanted to put one on is .89 acres. I think legislation will change drastically in the next five years concerning wind energy. At least I hope so.
Thanks for your post. I am hopeful that the legislative landscape will evolve rapidly. In the meantime, I have been driving across the midwest this past week. I’ve seen dozens of turbines — large & small. What a wonderful thing to see.
http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/green/articles/2008/05/15/documents_link_wind_farm_foes_to_energy_firm/
check this out
Interesting to see how you make out because I have a client nearby that is interested in a similar installation.
Preliminary research indicates that there is not sufficient wind to make these installations worthwhile other than along the coast.
I applaud you for your perseverance and thank you for taking the lead on this worthwhile fight. Once yours is approved, thousands will follow suit.